Flashcard · Twin and Higher-Order Pregnancy
Why does chorionicity matter clinically in twin pregnancy?
Answer
Chorionicity (not zygosity) determines the risks and management. Monochorionic twins (sharing a placenta) have markedly higher rates of miscarriage, growth restriction, preterm birth, and perinatal death than dichorionic, plus unique complications (TTTS, TRAP, co-twin death effects).
So monochorionic pregnancies need more intensive surveillance and specialist care.
Clinical relevance. Chorionicity determines the risk profile and surveillance intensity in twin pregnancy - monochorionic twins need closer specialist care.
More Detail
Clinical relevance of chorionicity
Chorionicity is the key factor determining twin pregnancy risk and care.
Why it matters more than zygosity
- Chorionicity (number of placentae), not zygosity, determines the risk profile - because monochorionic twins share a placenta with vascular connections.
Higher risks in monochorionic vs dichorionic
- Miscarriage (e.g. ~12% vs ~2% in 12-24 weeks), IUGR (~21% vs ~12%), preterm birth (<32 weeks, ~9% vs ~5%), and perinatal death (~2-3% vs ~1.6%) - all higher in monochorionic.
Unique monochorionic complications
- Twin-twin transfusion syndrome, TRAP/acardiac twin, selective growth restriction, and serious effects on the co-twin if one dies.
Implication for care
- Monochorionic twins need more intensive surveillance (e.g. 2-weekly scans), specialist fetal medicine input, and earlier delivery.
Practise every Obstetrics & Gynaecology topic
This is a free sample. Sign up for the full bank of flashcards and exam-style questions on a spaced-repetition schedule, with 20 free stars a day.
More on Twin and Higher-Order Pregnancy
- FlashcardWhen and how is chorionicity determined?
- SBA questionWhich aspect of antenatal management is particularly important in a twin pregnancy?
- SBA questionWhich of the following is a recognised maternal complication of multiple pregnancy?
- True/False MCQConcerning twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), the following statements are correct: